Luke Chapter
22.
Judas'
betrayal. 22:1-6. The feast of Unleavened Bread, and the
Passover, were not strictly identical. The
Passover was killed in the afternoon of the 14th. Nisan and eaten the same
night, i.e. according to the Jewish reckoning, at the beginning of the 15nth.
Nisan. (Creed).
It is not now the Pharisees but the priests and scribes who
are the chief opponents of Jesus. His
entrance into the Temple
was a challenge to them. The Temple, which should have
remained the proper centre of his ministry, becomes the occasion and centre of
antagonism to him. They knew not their
true glory.
Satan enters Judas to renew his attack on Jesus. After his defeat at the temptation, he
departed for a season (4:13), but he now comes upon the scene again.
Preparations
for the Passover.
22:7-13. A problem. The Synoptics seem to place the Passover on
the night before the Cross, while John associates the Cross on the day of the
Passover. Some argue that there was some
mistake of dating between the Saducees and Pharisees. Others, think that the Synoptics refer to the
Kiddush (a religious meal held by devote Jews), or a Haburah, (a meal taken
together by a group of friends). The Qumran scrolls bear evidence of another calendar, which
would have been known to the early Palestinian Christians. The Synoptics may have this calendar in
mind. Almost certainly, the Synoptics
refer to the Last Supper, as a Passover meal, see 22:13.
The last
Passover. 22:14-23. At the hour of the meal, there is panic, but
dignity and orderliness. Jesus knew what
was to befall him, and he is firm in his resolution to meet his death in Jerusalem. This is why he is so eager to eat this final
Passover meal with his disciples, before his Passion. The Passover was a type of the coming
Kingdom.
The head of the Jewish family began the meal by blessing the
cup, containing wine mingled with water.
22:17-18. Bitter Herbs ('endwe'
etc), were eaten. Bread was broken and
eaten, then a second cup, before the eating of the Lamb. It is not certain whether the Lord himself
drank the cup mentioned in 22:18, but see 22:14 in N.E.B.
22:19-20. It was
generally assumed that Hort had proved that 22:19b and 20 formed no part of the
original text, but there is a tendency among scholars to prefer the longer text
as the R.V. However, the return to the longer
text was not strong enough to get it further than the margin of the R.S.V and
the N.E.B. But there is an increasing
readiness to accept the longer text.
Donald Miller supports it.
Disputes of
rank. 22:24-27. The kings of the Gentiles are esteemed as
benefactors by their subjects, though usually such despots were concerned with
lining their pockets. But the Lord would
impart to his disciples a new principle of greatness. No one should make his superiority felt in
any other way than by his service to the weakest and most needful members. Jesus himself was the outstanding example of
this to others, though he was their recognized leader. His leadership was "a form of service,
not a kind of privilege." (W.T.M).
The reward of
the Apostles. 22:28-30. The eating and drinking at the Lord's Table
in the Kingdom is surely figurative of full rank, happiness and satisfaction
that shall be theirs. They shall be
given greater service. C.F.Hogg said
that reward in the Army may consist of increased pay, rank or greater
service. The real soldier would choose
greater opportunity for service.
The Father had appointed the Son a Kingdom but he must first
suffer and die. In like-manner, the Lord
appointed his disciples a Kingdom, for they had shared with him in his
trials. It is strange he should speak of
twelve thrones, when he had just spoken of the betrayer, but the election of
Matthias is anticipated. Luke is less
specific as to twelve thrones than Matthew (19:28).
The reference to the "twelve tribes of Israel" is
not easy. It may refer to the restored
nation of Israel, but it may
be symbolical of the new and spiritual Israel, comprising all believers,
the Church. The thought of reward being
increased for service, may suggest the new Israel; on the other hand, it may
be eschatological.
Prediction of
the apostle's desertion.
22:31-34. Satan's request, see
Job chapters 1 and 2. All should be
tested. R.V. "You," the first
pronoun is plural, see N.E.B. The second
"you," singular. The special need
of Peter.
The
effectualness of the Lord's prayer. Because of his advocacy Peter's
faith, though shaken, would not completely fail. Only the intercession of Christ preserved
Peter's faith, from failing utterly. ('ekleipo').
Peter's
conversion. People are not
twice regenerated, but some need to be converted again. The word 'epistrepho' is also translated,
"converted," see Vines Dict.
When Peter was turned again, he was to strengthen his
brethren, for all brothers would need help.
He would become strong, to strengthen others. The word, "strengthen" is 'sterizo'
(sterison). It means to fix firmly,
(16:26), direct one's self, or turn steadfast (9:51), and is translated
"establish" in the Epistles.
See Vine's Dictionary. Before
Peter could strengthen others, he must learn the true source of strength.
Peters
indignation. He was
self-confident and boastful. This
self-reliance was his ruin. He knew not
the power of Satan, nor his own weakness.
He was hurt to think that he was the subject of the Lord's special
supplication, for he was confident he was ready to do anything for his
Lord. Therefore his rash vow. The Lord knew all about Peter and that he
would deny him, not once, but thrice, and that, before daybreak.
The Purse and
the Sword. 22:35-38. Danger was at hand, but the reference to the
sword was symbolical, to stress that henceforth they must expect conflict and
persecution. All that was written
concerning Him was about to be fulfilled and he was to be counted as a lawless,
illegal person.
Christ's
prayer. 22:39-46. He went to Olivet, not to teach, but to
pray. The crisis had arrived. The hour of testing had come. Satan's activities were renewed against him
and his disciples. Prayer was their
safeguard in testing.
The cup is the suffering and death of the cross. The costliness of it all, now pressed upon
him. His prayer brings help from
heaven. Victory is achieved in
submission to the will of the Father.
Prayer enables us to bring our will in line with God's will. Jesus was aware that God had a plan, and all
was in step with His plan. There was the
agony ('agonia') of prayer. 'Agonia'
here means the terror of death. In
agony, he prayed more strenuously ('ektenesteron'). Arising victoriously from prayer, he came to
find his disciples sleeping - an ill time to sleep! "Satan always rocks the cradle when we
sleep at our devotions." Bp. Hall.
The arrest. 22:47-53.
The victory won in prayer, Jesus now quietly submits to arrest. As Judas would seek to kiss him, the Lord
asks him a question that should have touched his conscience. Jesus refused to countenance any violence on
the part of his disciples. Their real
task, was now to suffer.
What they must face is not battle, but temptation. The Lord challenged them on their manner of
arresting him. It was from cowardliness
that they did not arrest him in the daytime.
Obviously their seizure of him was only possible because the moral
darkness was permitted to briefly wield its power.
Peter denies
the Lord. 22:54-62. Peter failed to watch unto prayer and now
his weakness is exposed. Firstly, he
followed afar off. Then secondly, he
sits among those who arrested Jesus.
Peter would pass for one of their number. They had lit a fire, for Jerusalem nights at the Passover time, was
cold. Thirdly, he denies knowing Jesus.
The
self-confident Peter turns coward at the query of a maid. His threefold denial revealed his
weakness. Peter had been subjected to
testing and failed. However Peter loved
the Lord, but he had no strength and must learn to rely on God's power. Peter went out a broken man, and wept
bitterly.
Mistreatment
by the Officers.
22:63-65. The Temple police
subjected Jesus to brutal sport.
Before the
Sanhedrin. 22:66-71. They raised the charge of blasphemy. The Sanhedrin could hold no valid meeting
before daybreak, and what had been irregularly done in the night, had to be
formally transacted after dawn.
Jesus did not repudiate the suggestion that he claimed to be
the Christ, but he was a different kind of Messiah to that they expected. He would be glorified after his death (from
henceforth v.69).
No comments:
Post a Comment